This is the amazing story of Petr Brozek who finished just outside of the top 8 at Worlds in Rome and how he played monored in every single format!
This article originally appeared on cmus.cz and forms part of the Blackborder.com cmus.cz partnership.

Honza Brožek: Hi Petr, Worlds is in the books and your
performance was pretty good. What do you think about sharing your thoughts
about this tournament with our readers?
Sure, why not. There‘s nothing I wouldn‘t do
for our readers. :)
What were your goals for Worlds this year?
To win. I thought it was a cool idea and also
a good one. I am not like people who attend tournaments just to play – I am
always very ambitious.
But it seemed you wouldn‘t go at all just
two weeks before Worlds – what made you change your mind in the end?
In the end it was Jarda Bílek who talked me
over. He saw that I needed to get rid of the depressive black cloud hovering
over my head. He kept telling me it would be fun, that Adam Koska would also
go, that we‘ll stay together in Rome and will have a great time. Also he
assured me that the only thing I would have to do would be taking care of the
plane tickets – he‘ll handle the accomodation, test the decks for me, get all
the cards and boosters for MODO and also that he‘ll support me throughout the
whole tournament. I don‘t think anybody would have stayed at home with such a
service. The thing that made me decide to go in the end, however, was that he
was probably the only person (apart from myself) who trusted in my abilities to
score a good result. Thanks, Jarda!
So it seems you didn‘t have much time for preparation. What
did your preparation look like?
There really wasn‘t much time and I needed to
„get in touch“ with the game again, since the last tournament I had played
before Worlds was PT Kyoto. I had a clear idea about what to play both in
Standard and Extended – burn. The question was what version to choose. My
preparation for Limited would be – as usual – mostly theoretical, since I don‘t
really like Limited – I‘m not keen on playing with bad cards when I don‘t have
to.
Well in the end, when I found out how much the
other Czech guys had prepared, I had the feeling that maybe I did in fact too
much testing...
Why did you pick burn for Constructed? Was it because you
were looking for an „autopilot“ deck?
I wasn‘t looking for an „autopilot“ deck, I
would have taken Jund if I wanted to go that way. With Jund, all you have to do
is flip the right spells from cascade and that‘s what I call „autopilot“.
However, burn has helped me to some success already in the past year or so, I
knew how to play it and what‘s most important, I enjoyed playing it. Also, I‘ve
read in some internet forums that burn has a good matchup against Jund, which
was widely believed to be the best deck of the format. The testing I went
through didn‘t really show anything more than a 50/50 matchup, but to me it did
feel like in the whole Standard, everything had 50/50 against everything else,
so why not take some deck that I at least would enjoy playing.
As for Extended, the last time I played this
format was Worlds 2008 in Memphis,. I wanted to play burn this time as well,
but there really wasn‘t time to brew some brand new deck of my own, so I looked
somewhere else for inspiration and decided to play Saito‘s burn from Austin, although
he didn‘t post exactly a stellar record with it. Theoretically, Burn should
have a good matchup against Rubin Zoo, should be over 50% against the regular
Zoo and it is supposed to be ok against Dredge as well. What seems to be a
problem is combo, though. Well, I played a couple of games against Rubin Zoo to
improve my self-confidence and didn‘t really care about the rest of the
matchups.
Well, so far it doesn‘t really seem like you tested too much…
Not really, no. I found out quite early in
testing that I don‘t have enough time for proper testing and also I don‘t care enough.
So what I did instead was to focus on improving my mental game – my „victorious
spirit“.
Can you tell our readers a little more about this „victorious
spirit“?
I believe that it is much more important to
know how to win than just know how to play well. In Magic tournaments, the
standings are not set according to how well you played, but how much you won.
Therefore, I don‘t focus on being a good player, but instead on being the
victor. Of course you can‘t do that without reasonably good play skills on your
side, but that‘s not my priority. There was a very good article by Joel Calafell about related issues here on this site and
in my opinion, it was the best article about Magic ever written:
Level 6 Pro Player Joel Calafell explains the art of the mental game and how to work on it. If you want to progress as a player, you don't want to miss out on this masterpiece.
What about drafts? From what I saw you weren‘t very
successful in your testing…
Yeah, I didn‘t even read the whole spoiler and
I didn‘t attend the prerelease of Zendikar. I knew I wanted to know the cards
by pictures to orientate better during the drafting, so I did my fair share of
drafts on bestiaire. I concluded my Limited
testing with three 4-3-2-2 online drafts, even reaching round two of one of them.
I had read quite a lot of strategy articles about Limited though, so I had some
grip on the format at least on the theoretical level.
Seems like a lot of valuable testing :) How
was your trip to Rome and the people you were travelling with?
The company was awesome – Jarda Bílek, whom
I‘ve already mentioned, and Adam Koska, who was supposed to meet us directly in
Rome. He is a fellow traveller I know very well, since after PT Kyoto, we
travelled through Japan all the way from north to south for two weeks.
There were some minor problems before we left
for Rome – I found out that Jarda was indeed testing a deck for me, but not the
one I wanted to play. Also, it turned out he has almost all the cards for
Standard and Extended, but since he has never played burn, his collection is
missing a lot of red cards I wanted. More things went wrong when we found out
that the accomodation he booked was canceled and Adam had to save the day and
arrange the accomodation for us directly in Rome. I had to do some last minute
borrowing of cards, but in the end I boarded the flight to Rome with an almost
complete Extended burn deck and all the cards I needed for the Standard deck.
Thanks to everybody who lent me cards!
We took a cab from the airport to the main
train station (It cost just 2 Euros more than what the train ticket would have cost –
at least according to the taxi driver), where we met Adam and then we went just a
couple of blocks down the street to our „Two Ducks“ hostel.
And
then you set off to the site where the tournament would be taking place?
Yeah, we registered there, met the other Czech
guys and stuffed our bellys at the players‘ dinner. In the evening I fine-tuned
the deck for the last time and set my mind on buying a playset of Quenchable Fire tomorrow – Hanys Brodzák told me this card was good for the current
metagame and he was right – looking back, I could have played it maindeck.
We didn‘t playtest with Adam in the evening,
because we didn‘t want to lower the moral of whoever would lose more games.
Taking care of the morale was Jarda‘s job and he tried his best by making my decklist
for tomorrow public on the Czech magic site CMUS. The image of Yuuya Watanabe
sitting at his computer late in the night, refreshing CMUS over and over again
to find out what I would be playing tomorrow amused us and with this image,
we went to sleep.
How did
your day 1 go?
The first day started with a little surprise –
just before the flagbearers ceremony Martin Jůza called me on the phone
urgently, asking where am I and that I‘m supposed to carry the flag. I had to
think for a second, but when I assured myself that it was in fact last year
when I won Nationals, and I didn‘t even play
them this year, I had to disappoint Martin and tell him to search for our real
national champion from this year.
Seems
like a funny beginning of the day. What about the rest of the day?
I trusted in my abilities to post a good
result with the right draws, 5-1 like last year was not out of reality if
things would go the right way. Also I thought it might be a good thing to beat
a pro or two to increase my self-confidence.
In terms of matches, my day one was quite
uneventful. Five out of my six opponents started with a turn 1 Savage Lands. If
Jund manages to Blightning me twice, it‘s usually pretty hard to win. I can win
most games where they don‘t play any and if they Blightning me just once, it‘s a fair
game. I found out in the very first round that the Goblin Ruinblasters in my
board are quite mediocre. The Jund matchup is about something completely
different than destroying their land on turn four. The first guy I played
showed me three different basics on turn three and searched for a fourth one
with Borderland Ranger. What proved to be a really good card, though, were the
Quenchable Fires (thanks, Hanys!). The only situation thats stood out from the
monotonous matches was one that made me remember Nationals a couple of years
ago, where Martin Lamr was playing Ondřej Baudyš with a top 4 on the line. On
the last possible turn, Martin had to draw a burn spell to advance to the
semis. He cracked a fetchland at the end of the turn to increase the probability,
shuffled the deck… drew a bolt and beat his opponent. I used to play against
Martin a lot, so I trust his take on the probability. I tried to mimic him,
cracked a fetchland on the last possible turn… and history once again repeated
itself, since there was a Lightning Bolt smiling back at me from the top of my
library.

So all in all, I was 4-1 against Jund on my
day one.
What
about the non-Jund match?
The only opponent who didn‘t play Jund was a Russian
national team member with Eldrazi-Green. His deck didn‘t have White in it, so I
believe it should be a good matchup for me. In one game he only used one of his
three Oran-Riefs the whole time and it probably cost him this game, since in
the end I was able to sweep his board with an Earthquake and he ended up one
turn short from killing me. He won one game on the back of Fog, then the last
game my Planeswalkers helped me seal the deal.
So did
you play against some pro-player in the end?
I don‘t think so, these were my opponents:
- 2:1 vs. Leigh, Simon [DEU]
- 2:0 vs. Plinston ™, Andrew [NZL]
- 0:2 vs. Eberhard, Michael [CHE]
- 2:0 vs. Papadopoulos ™, Panagi [GRC]
- 2:1 vs. Koltsov ™, Ivan [RUS]
- 2:0 vs. Csomos™, Janos [SVK]
But you
were quite happy about you day one record, right?
Sure! I also knew I would be on table 2
tomorrow and Martin Jůza should be seated there as well, so my chances of playing against a pro opponent were
increasing. In addition, Adam promised to give me a couple of tips on how to
draft. The other Czechs gave me a little „walkthrough“ for Zendikar Limited
just after the six rounds of Standard had ended, so my theoretical preparation
couldn‘t be better. Before falling asleep, I reassured myself that I‘m going to
make top 8 and that 6-0ing the draft rounds could help with this.
And how
did the draft rounds go?
I was positive about taking red cards in draft,
because I enjoy playing Red and I knew the power of some of the red Zendikar
cards from Standard. Martin Jůza, sitting to my left, also suspected this, so
he had to hope not to open anything good in Red, since he would have to ship it
:) I first-picked a Plated Geopede, then I took another Plated Geopede over
Inferno Trap (I was just hoping Martin wouldn‘t také this as a signal). More
red cards followed and the only time I had to dip into another color was with a
late Vampire Hexmage. I didn‘t really read cards in the other colors and was
hoping to recieve more Red in pack two. However, I didn‘t open anything good in
Red, so I had to be content with taking Malakir Bloodwitch. The next packs were
rather dry and what made me a little nervous, was that I had only one Spire Barrage. The third booster gave me some quality cards in Trusty Machete and a
sixth pick Chandra Ablaze, but nothing special.
In the end, the deck looked solid (Adam agreed
on that) and although it wasn‘t a clear monoRed, the splash for Bloodwitch was
worth it.
This decklist forms part of my latest feature article:
This is the amazing story of Petr Brozek who finished just outside of the top 8 at Worlds in Rome and how he played monored in every single format!
| Colors |
|---|
| Artifact | 3 |
|---|
| Black | 3 |
|---|
| Land | 18 |
|---|
| Red | 16 |
|---|
| Converted Mana Cost |
|---|
| 1 | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | 2 |
|---|
| 6 | 1 |
|---|
| Type |
|---|
| Artifact | 3 |
|---|
| Basic Land | 17 |
|---|
| Creature | 14 |
|---|
| Enchantment | 1 |
|---|
| Instant | 2 |
|---|
| Land | 1 |
|---|
| Planeswalker | 1 |
|---|
| Sorcery | 1 |
|---|
So who
did you play against in the next rounds?
First some Italian guy. I didn‘t know him, but
he ended up in the top8. He told me his deck was really bad. I responded by
telling him this is my fourth Zendikar draft ever. In the first game, the only
spells I played for the whole game were Plated Geopede, Malakir Bloodwitch and
Blazing Torch, but it was enough. My opponent told me I really do have the better deck. He won the
second game with a flurry of allies led by their red boss. The third game came
down to a rather complex situation: I had four Mountains a Swamp, Molten Ravager, a 4/3 giant and a fully charged Soul Stair Expedition in play (with no
creatures in the yard), holding a Spire Barrage and the Bloodwitch. My opponent
was at 8 and if he drew a second Forest, he could kill me with a swing + Vines of the Vastwood and two damage from a Hellfire Mongrel. I thought about what to
do for a while and then decided to close my eyes and go for an all-in attack.
Luckily my opponent blocked in a way that he took four from a pumped Ravager
and traded one of his creatures for the Giant, which I could then bring back
with the expedition to avoid taking two from his Hellfire Mongrel. He ended up
drawing the Forest he needed and being one damage short of killing me.
In round two, I played against a Japanese guy
and killed him with a Spirre Barage to the dome in the decider.
In the last round I finally met Martin Jůza.
The first game was decided by dealing him eight damage with Chandra, in the
second he‘s never really in the game, since most of his cards are lands. I
finish him with a Spire Barrage to the dome of course.
First draft 3:0
- 2:1 vs. Cavaglieri, William [ITA]
- 2:1 vs. Sakai, Yoshitoki [JPN]
- 2:0 vs. Juza, Martin [CZE]
Thanks to 3-0ing my first draft, I‘m seated at
pod one for the second. BDM, who is about to follow my picks for the draft
viewer, asks me what did I play in the first draft. My answer is of course „Red“
and even if Brian asked the same question about yesterday‘s Standard, the
answer would have been the same. So of course I then proceed to first pick a
Spire Barrage and go for monored.
This decklist forms part of my latest feature article:
This is the amazing story of Petr Brozek who finished just outside of the top 8 at Worlds in Rome and how he played monored in every single format!
| Colors |
|---|
| Artifact | 2 |
|---|
| Land | 18 |
|---|
| Red | 20 |
|---|
| Converted Mana Cost |
|---|
| 1 | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | 7 |
|---|
| 3 | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | 5 |
|---|
| Type |
|---|
| Artifact | 1 |
|---|
| Artifact Creature | 1 |
|---|
| Basic Land | 17 |
|---|
| Creature | 11 |
|---|
| Enchantment | 4 |
|---|
| Instant | 1 |
|---|
| Land | 1 |
|---|
| Sorcery | 4 |
|---|
You can
see all the picks in the draft viewer here.
What did the games look like? You didn’t mange to go undefeated?
Unfortunately not, but I finally started to
play against some pro players and I liked that. The first Pro (and also my
favourite one) Tomoharu Saito waited for me in the first round. His UB deck
wasn‘t able to handle my massive Spire Barrages, though. Before the game
started, I tried to imagine a perfect opening hand… and the one I really got
was almost the same. Explorer‘s Scope, Geopede, Expedition, Spire Barrage and
lands, with the Scope hitting a land every turn. In the real game, Plated Geopede
was on the recieving end of some removal, so I had to plop a Geyser Glider into
play and finish Saito with a Spire Barrage one turn later than planned. I lost
the second game to a Living Tsunami and Malakir Bloodwitch and in the third
game, Saito didn‘t find an answer to Bladetusk Boar. When he found out from the
onlookers that I play monored in all formats, he asked me what I was going to
play tomorrow, so I told him I wanted to run his monored from Austin with a couple
of small tweaks.
In the second round I was paired against Dutch
player Bram Snapvangers. However, there was a man in black waiting for me at
the table and he didn‘t come for my autograph. He told me something‘s wrong
with my decklist (I didn‘t write down a last minute change I made) and rewarded
me with a game loss. I assured myself I was going to win 2-1 then, but Bram had
a different opinion and showed me just how good Grazing Gladehart with Harrow
is, especially when I didn‘t draw enough lands to power my Expedition and
Geyser Glider.
In the third round I was in the feature match
with Shouta Yasooka. There wasn‘t really anything notable about this match
except for the fact, that Yasooka joined the group of players who saw Spire Barrage as the last card in their match.
Second draft 2:1 (Drafts Total 5:1)
- 2:1 vs. Saitou, Tomoharu [JPN]
- 0:2 vs. Snepvangers, Bram [NLD]
- 2:0 vs. Yasooka, Shouta [JPN]
Well,
you had a great run after two days.
Yeah, I was starting to take the top8 as a
certain thing :)
So for
Extended, it would be burn again, right? Some last minute changes?
In the evening, I decided to abandon Saito‘s
build in favor of a different one, that was more successful in Austin. What
made me change my mind was the addition of Molten Rains, which were supposed to
grant an extra turn against combo and weren‘t exactly bad in the Zoo matchup as
well. I added Blood Moons to the board, since they looked good on paper. The
changes I made from the Austin decklist were adding a fourth Shrapnel Blast and
swapping Spark Elementals for Fanatics, since I expected a fair amount of
Dredge at the top tables. I played a couple of games against Adam‘s Zoo, got
the impression that the matchup is almost a coin flip and went to sleep.
This decklist forms part of my latest feature article:
This is the amazing story of Petr Brozek who finished just outside of the top 8 at Worlds in Rome and how he played monored in every single format!
| Converted Mana Cost |
|---|
| 1 | 16 |
|---|
| 2 | 14 |
|---|
| 3 | 8 |
|---|
| Type |
|---|
| Basic Land | 9 |
|---|
| Creature | 16 |
|---|
| Instant | 10 |
|---|
| Land | 13 |
|---|
| Sorcery | 12 |
|---|
How did
the changes you made work out in the end?
Well, it wasn‘t a very good version. Molten Rains didn‘t really do what I wanted them to do and it felt like I was missing
Magma Jets. Also, I had absolutely no clue how to sideboard (that‘s not the
deck‘s fault, of course :)). I was even urged by the judges to sideboard faster
– twice.

How did
the rounds go?
It started in a great way, I beat Conley Woods
in the first round. In game two, I mulliganed down to three to his seven and still
beat him :)
How did
you do that?
He took seven damage from his own lands and
the three spells I played (Hellspark Elemental, Shrapnel Blast, Lightning Bolt)
were enough to do him in. Of course the Lightning Bolt was the last possible
card from the top :) After the game finished, Conley‘s friends kept telling
him, that he could have won if he played his duals tapped and didn‘t take so
much damage from them. Conley explained that people keep hands with no lands
after mulliganing to three and that he was trying to kill me before I draw some
business spells.

I beat Marijn Lybaert in the next round. I
lost game one because I didn‘t know what deck he was playing – it didn‘t really
look like Rubin Zoo when he started Mountain-Forest-Noble Hierarch.
So what
did you do wrong?
I burnt the Hierarch and destroyed the Forest
with a Molten Rain and in the end, I was short the damage I could‘ve dealt with
those spells to kill Marijn.
So
after defeating Marijn, what score did you need to top8? And what happened that
you didn‘t make it?
I was 12-2, so all I needed was a win and a
draw out of four rounds. Of course that seemed possible at that moment, but the
luck shied away from me a little. I mulliganed to five against
soon-to-be-world-champ Andre Coimbra and the winning Shrapnel Blast got
countered by his Bant Charm. In the second game, I drew five straight lands to
the hand of Goblin Guide, three burn spells and three lands, so although
Coimbra kept a land-shy hand with just one land and a Noble Hierarch, he was able to
survive and draw into enough lands to beat me.
In the next round, I played against my nemesis
– Bram Snapvangers, with Dark Depths. In the first game, I was one damage, card
or turn short of killing him. I needed to draw my third land for a very long
time and on the last possible turn I would have actually won if I drew anything
except for six certain cards (Molten Rains and Rift Bolts), but it wasn‘t to be
and Bram survived at one life with me holding three Molten Rains but just two
lands in play. After sideboarding, I beat Bram all the way to four life and
even disrupted the combo he had just tutored for with a Blood Moon, but two
consecutive Chalices (for one and two) almost locked me out of the game. I
could‘ve killed him if I drew enough Hellspark Elementals and Rift Bolts, but
he drew the actions spell first in the form of Vendillion Clique that managed
to kill me.

How was your mood at this point? Did you still believe you
could reach the top8?
I did, but I needed to cheer myself up a
little and stop thinking about the two previous rounds. Those two losses didn‘t
really help to improve my „victorious spirit“ at all. What did cheer me up a
bit, thought, was a little episode with Yuuya Watanabe that happened between
the rounds. After Martin Jůza told Yuuya that I‘m likely to play Saito in the
next round and can help eliminate him from top8 (Saito could still beat Yuuya
in PoY if he made top4), Yuuya kneeled down in front of me and bowed twice with
his hands clasped on his forehead saying „kill Saito, please!“. At least for a
moment, I could feel like a Japanese emperor, in front of whom even the best
Samurai kneeled down. With my mood improved, I went to see the pairings for the
next round to find out who I would be playing.
Do tell.
I played Florian Pils with the Scapeshift
combo. It is supposed to be quite a bad matchup on paper, but I managed to
squeeze out a 2-1 win and all I needed to top8 was a draw.

What
happened that you didn‘t make it in the end?
I was paired with Manuel Bucher and
unfortunately due to his bad tiebreakers he couldn‘t afford to draw. He had to
play it out and I wasn‘t ready for that, since I was already counting on
drawing into the top8. Another problem was that I had no idea what deck Manuel was
playing. In the first game, I killed him after keeping a somewhat shaky hand
with just one land (I drew the second one imidiately, though). I sided in Blood Moon for the second game and even managed to draw it, but Manuel had two
Forests and two Islands in play and killed me with a pair of Goyfs. I took out
the Blood Moons for the decider, but my draw wasn‘t aggressive enough and I
lost. I could‘ve made better decisions at some points, but I don‘t think it
would have mattered in the end (as long as Manuel wouldn‘t make some colossal
misplay). So this is how my Extended rounds wound up and also my whole Worlds
performance.

Extended 3-3:
- 2:0 vs. Woods, Conley [USA]
- 2:1 vs. Lybaert, Marijn [BEL]
- 0:2 vs. Coimbra, André [PRT]
- 0:2 vs. Snepvangers, Bram [NLD]
- 2:1 vs. Pils, Florian [DEU]
- 1:2 vs. Bucher, Manuel [CHE]
How did you feel?
Sad. Fortunately, there were enough people to
support me in this sad moment (thanks).
How would you evaluate Worlds now, two weeks after it took
place?
I‘m grateful for the finish because it showed
me that it is possible to beat anybody and also it qualified me and paid my
trip to the next Pro Tour. The top8 that I missed, while it was so close, of course still hurts a
little, but my insufficient preparation definitely took its toll. On the other
hand, the „victorious spirit“ worked very well. Regarding the deck choices I
made, I would keep the maindeck of my Standard list, but change the sideboard a
little. Drafts went unexpectedly well and as for Extended, I would still play
burn, but a different version – probably the same 75 that Saito ran in Austin.
I‘m glad that I could play against so many
good players (I played six players from the top8 of Worlds and two out of the
first three players in the PoY standings).
Is there something more that you‘d like to
tell our readers, some tips for tournament play or just something general worth
mentioning?
Don‘t think JUST about winning, enjoy the game
as well, because if you don‘t, even winning can‘t really bring you joy. Also,
feel free to ask about anything you would like to know in the comments.
Thanks
for your time,
Honza Brožek & Petr Brožek
I really enjoyed this...thanks.
Yeah...just trusting your victorious spirit :)
You, sir, are a truly reckless man. And that's a compliment :P
I'll throw out a question since you said "
feel free to ask about anything you would like to know in the comments.
".
What's your opinion on the cheating going on at the Pro Tour? Not just cases such as the American champ / Master of the Wild Hunt, but also people who run other cheats regularly but still get to play on the tour and make money?
Congratz and keep up the awesome writing.
First off, I would like to say congrats on obtaining 12th. Participating in Worlds is a challenge in and of itself, and 12th place even more so. As a player who enjoys to have fun and win at the same time, what would you recomend for a player who is more of a johnny that will allow him to make it to a level such as you are. Perhaps some things the player can look for when building deck?
Thanks for your feedback.
1) Cheating
There should be written a lot about cheating as it is a really complex issue (kinds of cheating, motivation, morality of doing so..). In short - I dissaprove cheating but I understand why people are doing so.
In my oppinion, there will always be someone who is cheating at Pro Tours. Basically, people are cheating in every sphere of human activity that is controlled by some rules. The benefits (on material level) are often just worth the risk of being captured when breaking the rules.
But as long as there are appropriate sanctions for all kinds of cheating and a good controlling system, I don't see it as a realy big problem in Magic tournaments.
What I see as an effective way of dealing with cheating is talking about penalties and showing concrete examples of disqualifications/bannings. And of course making clear what is/is not cheating to all players.
2) johnny
One thing at the beginning - my results are one thing and my level is another. To prove that I have some level I'll have to do more good results (I am waiting for any REALLY good result actually).
I can't tell something in general about deckbuilding you asked me for. I only can share some of the rules I usually follow when I am building a deck.
1. Be sure why are you building a deck.
My main aims are usually those - to enjoy playing, to win, to show other people that my self-made deck is good.
2. Do not build your deck in a vacuum.
I allways want to know the metagame and avoid playing deck, that is bad against most played decks.
3. Go rogue.
I am always trying to avoid netdecking. I want to be creative. It lowers the chances of my opponents being prepared.
4. Know your own cards.
Not only in sense of rules. I want to know the purpose of each card in my deck - why I am going to play exactly this card and not another one.
5. Your deck, your friend
Play cards you like (but only if they are good enough obv). Playing cards you like is important as it makes you more familiar with your deck. Being familiar with your deck leads to more comfortable feeling during the tournament which is one of the factors influencing good results.
Hi - nice article Petr - I love red decks too! Can you maybe link Saito's original list from Austin, or quickly list it? I can't seem to find it anywhere on the net... Thanks :)
Burn by Tomoharu Saito, PT Austin
Pro Tour–Austin: Extended Deck Lists Q-Z http://wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/eventcoverage/ptaus09/decksqz
Main Deck
4 Blinkmoth Nexus 4 Great Furnace 10 Mountain 2 Teetering Peaks
4 Goblin Guide 4 Hellspark Elemental 4 Keldon Marauders 4 Mogg Fanatic
4 Lava Spike 4 Lightning Bolt 4 Magma Jet 2 Pithing Needle 4 Rift Bolt 2 Shard Volley 4 Shrapnel Blast
Sideboard
3 Ghost Quarter 1 Pithing Needle 3 Ravenous Trap 3 Smash to Smithereens 1 Tormod's Crypt 4 Browbeat (I was told by Martin Juza that this is a mistake on wizards website, Saito played 4 Lash Outs instead of Browbeats)
Post new comment